NHD Extra June issue 125
Page 49 – Activity equivalent labelling versus the sugar tax
1 Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH). Introducing ‘activity equivalent’ calorie labelling to tackle obesity. 2016 [cited 14 March 2017]. Available from: www.rsph.org.uk/asset/34B3898D-9389-4DE1-8B1A86BE69CD5D13/
2 Masic U, Christiansen P and Boyland EJ. The influence of calorie and physical activity labelling on snack and beverage choices (2017). Appetite. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.007
3 HM Revenue & Customs. Policy Paper. Soft Drinks Industry Levy. 2016 [cited 14 March 2017] Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/soft-drinks-industry-levy/soft-drinks-industry-levy
4 Smed S, Jensen JD and Denver S. Socio-economic characteristics and the effect of taxation as a health policy instrument (2007). Food Policy; 32(5): 624-639
5 Darmon N, Lacroix A, Muller L and Ruffieux B. Food price policies improve diet quality while increasing socioeconomic inequalities in nutrition (2014). International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity; 11:66
6 Cabrera Escobar MA, Veerman JL, Tollman SM, Bertram MY and Hofman KJ. Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis (2013). BMC Public Health;13: 1072
7 Briggs ADM, Mytton OT, Kehlbacher A, Tiffin R, Raynerm M and Scarborough P. Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study (2013). British Medical Journal. 347:f6189
8 Sonnenberg L, Gelsomin E, Levy DE, Riis J, Barraclough S and Thorndike AN. A traffic light food labeling intervention increases consumer awareness of health and healthy choices at the point-of-purchase (2013). Preventive Medicine; 57(4): 253-257
9 World Cancer Research Fund. Cited 15 March 2017. Available at: www.wcrf-uk.org/uk/here-help/health-tools/exercise-calorie-calculator
10 Briggs ADM, Mytton OT, Kehlbacher A, Tiffin R, Elhussein A, Rayner M and Jebb SA. Health impact assessment of the UK soft drinks industry levy: a comparative risk assessment modelling study (2017). The Lancet; 2(1): e15-e22
11 Dowler E and Lambie-Mumford H. ‘How Can Households Eat in austerity? Challenges for Social Policy in the UK’ (2015). Social Policy and Society; 14(3): 417-429
12 Swartz JJ, Dowray S, Braxton D, Mihas P and Viera AJ. Simplifying healthful choices: a qualitative study of a physical activity based nutrition label format. 2013. Nutrition Journal; 12:72
13 Cramer S. Food should be labelled with the exercise needed to expend its calories (2016). BMJ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1856
14 Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M and Marteau TM. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis (2013). BMC Public Health; 13: 756-767
15 Timpson H, Lavin R and Hughes L. Exploring the Acceptability of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Insight Work (2013). Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University
16 Van Kleef E and Dagevos H. The Growing Role of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Profile Labeling: A Consumer Perspective on Key Issues and Controversies (2015). Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition; 55(3): 297-303